I suppose I'm a bit weird, but I kind of like getting all the folks from my college together for a day of thought-provoking conversations and presentations (today's wasn't that thought-provoking, disappointingly: it just repeated what we already know because community colleges are like canaries in the coal mines -- we see all the stuff research institutions eventually get around to observing . . . we see it at least five years earlier). My conversations with colleagues were good, though.
Although I like these days, I do wish that it wasn't the only way we heard about important initiatives at my college. We have the *worst* communication I've ever seen, anywhere, ever.
Personally, I think it's because we've doubled in size since I've been there, but we haven't figured out how to keep up with the infrastructure. We still operate with the "Mary is the person who does that" mentality, when it's tough to know who "Mary" is or what her position is . . . we still operate as if we all saw each other in the "lunch room" once a day.
The simplest things are impossible to find because our college website is rotten: just try to search for an org chart so you can know who answers to whom, who might be responsible for something if you have a question: impossible to find, or if you do, the information is out of date. (We even have courses listed on our class schedule that do not even exist at our college!)
So for me, it's important to go to these all-day events to see people and hear what the administration has in mind. If I was a conspiracy theorist, I'd say that our communication is rotten *on purpose* to force us to go to the all-day retreats!
Evacuation roots
5 hours ago
2 comments:
I agree that our whole-college communication is horrific... on the other hand, I'd rather have done my routine PET scan than go to the development day.
I think I really soured on "Jimmie's day" a few years ago. The year I'm thinking about started with the results of a really poorly designed survey about our "intercultural awareness". The author of that bad survey then interpreted the results to say that we were all xenophobic idiots. I'm pretty sure the author was ABD from the U... so, not exactly a real authority.
Oh, I *so* remember that ABD "expert": she was horrible, horrible, horrible. I think the college must have been trying to save money -- get a "FOL" to talk to us.
Maybe things couldn't get any worse than that? I'm always hopeful . . . . Couldn't do my job, otherwise ;-)
Post a Comment